Arin LogoArin
Back

Phenoxyethanol

Safe0 products
CAS
122-99-6
EC
2045897
PubChem CID
31236
Molecular Formula
C8H10O2
Molecular Weight
138.1600 g/mol

Limits germ growth. A widely used safe preservative.

What does it do?

A preservative used to limit germ growth throughout the product's shelf life.

Details

One of the most commonly used preservatives. Prevents germ growth. Considered safe up to 1% and is found in many cosmetic products. It is synthetic and well-tolerated by the skin.

Restrictions

Also known as

Function & Use

Preservative

Regulatory note

  • EU 1223/2009 Annex VAllowed

    Maximum concentration: 1%

Industry GHS notices (PubChem)

These are industry self-reports to ECHA, not our regulatory assessment.

  • H302(99.8%)- Harmful if swallowed
  • H318(13.0%)- Causes serious eye damage
  • H319(87.0%)- Causes serious eye irritation
  • H320- Causes eye irritation
  • H335(13.0%)- May cause respiratory irritation
  • H336- May cause drowsiness or dizziness
  • H361- Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child
PubChem CID 31236
The verdict isn’t ours: below is what ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database), SCCS (EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review), EPA ToxCast (high-throughput in vitro screening) said, verbatim.

What The Sources Say

SCCS (EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety)2
Safety assessment

EU 1223/2009 Annex V — SCCS opinion: OPINION ON Phenoxyethanol

Safety assessment

EU 1223/2009 Annex V — SCCS opinion: Opinion concerning Restrictions on Materials listed in annex VI of Directive 76/768/EEC on Cosmetic Products

CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review)1
Irritation & sensitizationView source →

Details on the dermal sensitization studies summarized below can be found in Table 4. An eyelash product containing 0.018% Ethyl Tafluprostamide (n = 51; tested neat) and 7.5% Ethyl Tafluprostamide in phenoxyethanol (n = 54) were considered to be non-sensitizing in human repeat insult patch tests (HRIPTs).4 HRIPTs were also performed using eyelash serums containing Isopropyl Cloprostenate (0.0044% and 0.005%; tested neat; n = 50-56).14-17 The majority of assays were performed under semi-occlusive conditions. The serums tested were considered to be non- irritating and non-sensitizing in all assays.

ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database)11
Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Eye Irritation, classification: Eye irritation - category 2A. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Skin Irritation, classification: Not classified. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Skin Sensitization, classification: Not classified. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Eye Irritation, classification: Category 6.4A (Category 2A). Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: eye irritation: in vivo, classification: Severe Irritation, species: rabbit, study: eye irritation, guideline: OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion) according to, year: 1983. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

+6 more records.

EPA ToxCast (high-throughput in vitro screening)1
Safety assessmentView source →

EPA ToxCast ER model: NO estrogen receptor activity found (AUC agonist=0, antagonist=0). Tested in 18 in vitro assays. Caveat: this is an in vitro screening model with no dose or exposure context; it does NOT mean an effect occurs in humans at cosmetic use levels.

Scientific References