Arin LogoArin
Back

CI 16185

Allergen0 products
CAS
915-67-3
EC
2130222
PubChem CID
13506
Molecular Formula
C20H11N2Na3O10S3
Molecular Weight
604.5000 g/mol

A full English write-up is not available yet. Category and regulatory notes above still apply.

Functions

Restrictions

Function & Use

Cosmetic Colorant

Regulatory note

  • EU 1223/2009 Annex IIProhibited

Industry GHS notices (PubChem)

These are industry self-reports to ECHA, not our regulatory assessment.

  • H315(15.7%)- Causes skin irritation
  • H319(73.9%)- Causes serious eye irritation
  • H335(15.7%)- May cause respiratory irritation
PubChem CID 13506
The verdict isn’t ours: below is what ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database), IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) said, verbatim.

What The Sources Say

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)1
General assessmentView source →

IARC Group 3 — Not classifiable as to carcinogenicity. The available evidence is insufficient for a classification. This does NOT mean 'safe'; it means 'not enough data'. (Monograph volume: 8, Sup 7). Caveat: IARC classifies HAZARD, not RISK — it says 'can cause cancer under some conditions', not 'causes cancer at cosmetic use levels'. Route and dose must be assessed separately. Data is a 01/2021 snapshot.

ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database)6
Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Skin Sensitization, classification: Skin sensitization - Category 1. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA), classification: Not likely to be sensitizing, species: guinea pig, study: skin sensitization, guideline: equivalent or similar to OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation), year: 1975. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: skin irritation: in vivo, classification: Studies Indicate No Significant Irritation, species: rabbit, study: skin irritation, guideline: OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion) equivalent or similar to, year: 1975. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo, classification: Corrosive or Irritation Persists for > 21 days, species: human, study: eye irritation, guideline: other guideline: OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage) according to, year: 2017. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB kanser değerlendirmesi: 3 - Not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

+1 more records.

Scientific References