Arin LogoArin
Back

Benzoic acid

Safe0 products
CAS
65-85-0
PubChem CID
243
Molecular Formula
C7H6O2
Molecular Weight
122.1200 g/mol

Acid used as a preservative, causing a slight taste. Also used as a preservative in foods. No known harm.

What does it do?

A preservative used to prevent products from spoiling.

Details

An acid found naturally in many fruits, used as a preservative in cosmetics and foods. It prevents the growth of bacteria and fungi. Generally considered safe, but can be irritating at high concentrations. The EU limits it to 2.5% in rinse-off products, 1.7% in oral care products, and 0.5% in leave-on products.

Restrictions

Function & Use

Masking

Preservative

Bulking

Regulatory note

  • EU 1223/2009 Annex VAllowed

Industry GHS notices (PubChem)

These are industry self-reports to ECHA, not our regulatory assessment.

  • H302(29.7%)- Harmful if swallowed
  • H315(82.8%)- Causes skin irritation
  • H318(81.3%)- Causes serious eye damage
  • H319(16.4%)- Causes serious eye irritation
  • H335- May cause respiratory irritation
  • H361- Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child
  • H372(20.5%)- Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure
  • H402- Harmful to aquatic life
PubChem CID 243
The verdict isn’t ours: below is what ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database), SCCS (EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), EPA ToxCast (high-throughput in vitro screening) said, verbatim.

What The Sources Say

SCCS (EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety)3
Safety assessment

EU 1223/2009 Annex V — SCCS opinion: Opinion on Benzoic Acid and Sodium Benzoate

Safety assessment

EU 1223/2009 Annex V — SCCS opinion: Opinion concerning Restrictions on Materials listed in annex VI of Directive 76/768/EEC on Cosmetic Products

+1 more records.

ToxValDB (EPA Toxicity Value Database)14
Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Eye Irritation, classification: Serious eye damage/eye irritation - Category 2. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Eye Irritation, classification: Category 1. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Skin Irritation, classification: Classification not possible. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Skin Sensitization, classification: Classification not possible. Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

Hazard claimView source →

EPA ToxValDB skin/eye data — endpoint: Eye Irritation, classification: Category 6.4A (Category 2A). Caveat: this is an aggregated record; dose, species and route of exposure must be considered together.

+9 more records.

EPA ToxCast (high-throughput in vitro screening)1
Safety assessmentView source →

EPA ToxCast ER model: NO estrogen receptor activity found (AUC agonist=0, antagonist=0). Tested in 18 in vitro assays. Caveat: this is an in vitro screening model with no dose or exposure context; it does NOT mean an effect occurs in humans at cosmetic use levels.

Scientific References